An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair into the offender and also the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The ruling from the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until finally or Except if both new legislation is created, or possibly a higher court rules differently.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed into the disposal of the moment petition about the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner and private respondents and will just take care of every one of the elements of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—is the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support of the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, the decision of your Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. Read more
Because of this, merely citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling anyone to inform them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in such-and-this sort of community, without actually supplying them an address. Driving throughout the neighborhood looking to find their phone is likely to be more frustrating than it’s truly worth.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a perfectly-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic to the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons obtaining their character previously mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to your Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature of your petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits can be withheld on account in the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established via the government.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided by the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, read more completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are set up by executive organizations based on statutes.